• Our opinion of value  is based on visiting the subject property, the location, the comps and performing proper analysis. In other words, we must have properly followed the 6-step requirement of USPAP (click on the link to get a free electronic copy of USPAP) in order to arrive at a reasonable value of opinion for the property.
  • We can however provide the clients with a range of prices that similar properties had been sold within the last 3-6 months and we call it a comp-check .
  • The range of prices that we arrive might be different from opinion of value for the same property.

The following questions are asked by many appraisers: if they can legally perform a comp check without being in violation of USPAP. We have prepared the following Q&A section to answer your concerns:

Q: I was asked to perform a comp check. Assuming that I have complied with all applicable USPAP regulations, this comp check what type of assignment would be considreded?

A: It is a part of appraisal practice for which there is no STANDARDS

Q: Can Appraisers Perform "Comp Check" Assignments?
Question: I'm a residential appraiser and have been asked to perform a "comp check" (or "pre-comp") assignment, where a client wants to get an idea of the value of a home prior to proceeding with a mortgage financing transaction. Does USPAP allow me to perform this type of assignment?

Response: Yes. As stated in FAQ #130 in the 2008-09 edition of the USPAP document, these types of assignments are allowed under USPAP. To understand the USPAP requirements, it is important to identify exactly what the appraiser is being asked to do. If the appraiser is asked to "provide comps," that would typically mean the appraiser would be exercising his or her own judgment to determine which sales are most "comparable" to the subject property. The appraiser may choose to include only those sales that he or she deems are most similar to the subject in size, location, quality, etc., which could mean that certain sales may be omitted. In this case, the resulting data would have been "filtered" by the appraiser's judgment, which would have the net effect of providing a range of value to the client. This range of value is defined as an appraisal under USPAP; therefore, the appraiser would be obligated to comply with STANDARDS 1 and 2.
But as FAQ #130 also states, "comp check" assignments should be contrasted to requests for an appraiser to simply provide data. For example, an appraiser asked by a client to provide "sales data of all homes located within a one mile radius" of a specific address could comply with the client's request without complying with STANDARDS 1 and 2, because the appraiser would just be providing sales data pursuant to the client's defined parameters. In this example, the appraiser must be careful not to communicate any opinions or conclusions regarding the data provided.
For additional related guidance on this topic, please refer to Advisory Opinion 19, Unacceptable Assignment Conditions in Real Property Appraisal Assignments and Illustration #4 "Appraisal and Market Information" in Advisory Opinion 21, USPAP Compliance.

Can Appraisers Perform "Comp Check" Assignments for Free?
Question: Does USPAP allow appraisers to perform "comp check" assignments for free?

Response: Yes. However, the appraiser would have to ensure that receiving a "full" appraisal assignment is not contingent upon the result of the "comp check" assignment. The Management section of the ETHICS RULE states, in part:
It is unethical for an appraiser to accept an assignment, or to have a compensation arrangement for an assignment, that is contingent on any of the following:
1. the reporting of a predetermined result (e.g., opinion of value);
2. a direction in assignment results that favors the cause of the client;
3. the amount of a value opinion;
4. the attainment of a stipulated result; or
5. the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the appraiser's opinions and specific to the assignment's purpose.
(Bold added for emphasis)

Is Disclosure of a Free "Comp Check" Assignment Required?
Question: If I perform a free "comp check" assignment and my client subsequently requests me to perform a "full" (or more "traditional") assignment on the same property, do I have to disclose the free "comp check" assignment as having provided a "thing of value" to procure the new assignment?

Response: No. The Management section of the ETHICS RULE states, in part:
The payment of undisclosed fees, commissions, or things of value in connection with the procurement of an assignment is unethical.
Since USPAP prohibits the second assignment from being contingent upon the first, the free "comp check" could not be considered part of "procuring" the second assignment. Therefore, disclosure of the free "comp check" assignment would not be required. Appraisers may, of course, elect to disclose the prior assignment, but it is not required by USPAP.
An appraiser can provide a free "comp check." An appraiser cannot provide a free "comp check" AND the pursuant appraisal if the engagement was contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.